The Guardian reports on the increasing adoption of employee monitoring software but asks whether it's a valuable tool to measure productivity.
The article includes the example of Mae, who shares her experience of being monitored. Many remote workers, including Mae, are being monitored by their employers using software that takes screenshots of their screens every 10 minutes. Based on how much she types and moves her mouse, Mae's activity score hovers around 62% but drops to 0% during Zoom calls, despite her active participation. Mae's company uses Hubstaff, one of several monitoring tools available, with some offering webcam and audio recording. Mae reports feeling intense pressure due to the constant monitoring, resulting in dry eyes and headaches.
A recent Trades Union Congress (TUC) poll found that 60% of employees experienced tracking in the last year. Henry Parkes, a senior economist at the IPPR, warns surveillance technology can be used to exert power over employees in a way that wasn't possible before. There's potential for creep, where software is deployed for one purpose but can be used for other features, allowing employers to analyse what their employees are doing.
What is this page?
You are reading a summary article on the Privacy Newsfeed, a free resource for DPOs and other professionals with privacy or data protection responsibilities helping them stay informed of industry news all in one place. The information here is a brief snippet relating to a single piece of original content or several articles about a common topic or thread. The main contributor is listed in the top left-hand corner, just beneath the article title.
The Privacy Newsfeed monitors over 300 global publications, of which more than 4,350 summary articles have been posted to the online archive dating back to the beginning of 2020. A weekly roundup is available by email every Friday.
