Following last week's news that Meta had won a reprieve in a £2.2 billion collective proceedings lawsuit, law firm Pinsent Masons have published a more detailed analysis of the Competition Appeal Tribunal's 46-page judgement. We already knew the Tribunal had ruled the methodology of establishing user losses required further evaluation. However, according to Pinsent Mason's analysis, the Tribunal criticised the proposed methodology for calculating potential damages but determined unfair pricing for digital platform services under competition law would need adjustment based on a number of “special factors”. The Tribunal also doubted whether the claims of unfair data requirement and unfair trading conditions claims could be attributed as abuses of a dominant position in breach of competition law. The Tribunal will dismiss the claim if a satisfactory revised methodology is not submitted within six months.
What is this page?
You are reading a summary article on the Privacy Newsfeed, a free resource for DPOs and other professionals with privacy or data protection responsibilities helping them stay informed of industry news all in one place. The information here is a brief snippet relating to a single piece of original content or several articles about a common topic or thread. The main contributor is listed in the top left-hand corner, just beneath the article title.
The Privacy Newsfeed monitors over 300 global publications, of which more than 4,350 summary articles have been posted to the online archive dating back to the beginning of 2020. A weekly roundup is available by email every Friday.
