Having been absent since January, it's good to see those clever 11KBW people behind the Panopticon blog have started writing again. Unfortunately, we missed their reemergence last month, along with the following two UK General Data Protection Regulation (GDPR) rulings.
GDPR & privacy damages: causation and quantum
- The first relates to the High Court ruling by Mr Justice Chamberlain. The case (Ali v Chief Constable of Bedfordshire [2023] EWHC 938 (KB) involves an informant, her cocaine-dealing husband, Bedfordshire Police and how the Social Services Department of Luton Borough Council did not even consider taking steps to conceal her identity.
Subject access disputes: exemptions, closed procedures
- The second analysis addresses the High Court ruling by Mrs Justice Farbey concerning the judicial exemption to subject access rights in UK GDPR and the Data Protection Act 2018. The case (X v Transcription Agency and Master James) involved a claimant who brought proceedings against a provider of court transcription services, along with a High Court Master and a Costs Judge challenging their refusal to provide him with his personal data.
What is this page?
You are reading a summary article on the Privacy Newsfeed, a free resource for DPOs and other professionals with privacy or data protection responsibilities helping them stay informed of industry news all in one place. The information here is a brief snippet relating to a single piece of original content or several articles about a common topic or thread. The main contributor is listed in the top left-hand corner, just beneath the article title.
The Privacy Newsfeed monitors over 300 global publications, of which more than 4,350 summary articles have been posted to the online archive dating back to the beginning of 2020. A weekly roundup is available by email every Friday.
