Why people are wrong to assume digital IDs are harmless
05/08/2025 | The Standard
In an op-ed for The Standard, Rebecca Vincent, Interim Director at Big Brother Watch, argues that a universal digital ID system, reportedly being considered by the government, would fundamentally upend civil liberties. Vincent believes that such a mandatory scheme, regardless of its name, would turn Britain into a "papers, please" society, creating significant burdens for citizens and employers.
Vincent claims that a digital ID would not be a solution for issues like illegal migration, but would instead force law-abiding citizens onto a system prone to the same failures and inaccuracies seen with the e-visa system. Vincent also raises concerns about digital inclusion, stating that the proposal makes insufficient provision for the vulnerable, including the elderly, poor, and those with low digital literacy, which could have a discriminatory and racialised impact.
Furthermore, she warns that a mandatory digital ID would give the government unprecedented access to and control over citizens' personal data, creating an attractive target for hackers.
What is this page?
You are reading a summary article on the Privacy Newsfeed, a free resource for DPOs and other professionals with privacy or data protection responsibilities helping them stay informed of industry news all in one place. The information here is a brief snippet relating to a single piece of original content or several articles about a common topic or thread. The main contributor is listed in the top left-hand corner, just beneath the article title.
The Privacy Newsfeed monitors over 300 global publications, of which more than 6,250 summary articles have been posted to the online archive dating back to the beginning of 2020. A weekly roundup is available by email every Friday.