Prince Harry loses phone hacking case against Daily Mail

In a significant victory at the High Court in London for the publishers of the Daily Mail, Associated Newspapers Limited (ANL), Mr Justice Nicklin has comprehensively dismissed a high-profile £50 million phone hacking lawsuit alleging extensive unlawful information gathering. The judgment is a devastating blow and costly defeat for the claimants, Prince Harry, Baroness Lawrence, Elton John, David Furnish, Elizabeth Hurley, Sadie Frost, and Simon Hughes, who had accused the publisher of severe misconduct such as installing secret listening devices, bribing police officers, and illicitly acquiring medical and financial documents.

Following an eleven-week trial, the judge concluded that the claimants failed to prove ANL had engaged in any unlawful activity, ruling that suspicion without conclusive evidence was insufficient. The claimants' case collapsed largely due to issues surrounding their key whistleblower witness, Gavin Burrows, who claimed his incriminating witness statement was a forgery. The judge strongly criticised the flawed process used by the claimants' legal team to compile the statement, labelling Burrows an unreliable witness. As a consequence of the verdict, the claimants now face a massive legal bill, with ANL actively seeking to recoup its extensive defence costs.

Training Announcement: Find out more about our range of independent accredited qualifications from BCS and IAPP. These include professional certifications for practitioners covering data protection and AI governance, information security and risk management, along with access to public information.