MPs reject social media ban for under-16s, give greater powers to ministers

MPs have voted 307 to 173 to reject a proposed ban on social media for children under 16. The amendment to the Children's Wellbeing and Schools Bill (CWSB), introduced by Lord Nash and supported by high-profile campaigners, aimed to address concerns over online harms. Despite voting against the ban, the government voted to give ministers broader powers to potentially restrict or ban Internet use for under-18s  in the future.

Among the additional powers granted to the Secretary of State for Science, Innovation and Technology are the ability to limit VPN use, restrict addictive features such as autoplay, and adjust the UK's age of digital consent. While supporters argued that a ban would protect children, critics such as the NSPCC warned that it could push teenagers toward unregulated parts of the internet. Minister for Early Education and Equalities Olivia Bailey noted these conflicting views and reinforced the need for the national consultation launched last week to determine future efforts.

In a blog article responding to the news, the Open Rights Group (ORG) warned that the move gives ministers significant powers to restrict Internet access without having to pass new legislation. James Baker, ORG Platform Power Programme Manager, said: "This broad amendment takes power away from parliament and Ofcom and hands it to ministers. Any future Government will not only be able to ban children from social media but any other website or online services of their choosing."

Training Announcement: Find out more about our range of independent accredited data protection and AI governance qualifications from IAPP and BCS.