In a landmark privacy case, the Supreme Court ruled against Bloomberg News, making it harder for media companies to publish information about people under investigation.
The case involved an article from 2016 where Bloomberg had named an American business executive working at a large public company who, at the time, was facing a British regulator's criminal inquiry. Bloomberg had obtained a confidential letter revealing that the businessman was being investigated about claims his company were involved in corruption and bribery in another country. The businessman decided to sue Bloomberg over the article, claiming the media company had misused his private information as he had not been arrested or charged with any offence.
Lord Hamblen and Lord Stephens said in the judgement: "For some time, judges have voiced concerns as to the negative effect on an innocent person's reputation of the publication that he or she is being investigated by the police or an organ of the state."
Read the Supreme Court press summary.
What is this page?
You are reading a summary article on the Privacy Newsfeed, a free resource for DPOs and other professionals with privacy or data protection responsibilities helping them stay informed of industry news all in one place. The information here is a brief snippet relating to a single piece of original content or several articles about a common topic or thread. The main contributor is listed in the top left-hand corner, just beneath the article title.
The Privacy Newsfeed monitors over 300 global publications, of which more than 4,350 summary articles have been posted to the online archive dating back to the beginning of 2020. A weekly roundup is available by email every Friday.
