Why we may not need new rights to address automated decision-making

10/10/2023 | The Conversation

recent study by Dr Elena Abrusci at Brunel University London and Dr Richard Mackenzie-Gray Scott at the Bonavero Institute of Human Rights, University of Oxford, indicates that creating new laws to protect people from automated decision-making (ADM) may not be necessary. The research argues that existing legal frameworks for data protection, non-discrimination, and human rights could be used to regulate ADM and offer protection against its negative impacts. The study highlights that ADM is not only a future problem but a present one, and implementing the existing laws properly could address some of the pressing issues related to technology. The success of this approach would depend on public and private bodies improving the procedural machinery required to enforce and oversee legal rules.

Read Full Story
Artificial intelligence, automated decision making

What is this page?

You are reading a summary article on the Privacy Newsfeed, a free resource for DPOs and other professionals with privacy or data protection responsibilities helping them stay informed of industry news all in one place. The information here is a brief snippet relating to a single piece of original content or several articles about a common topic or thread. The main contributor is listed in the top left-hand corner, just beneath the article title.

The Privacy Newsfeed monitors over 300 global publications, of which more than 4,350 summary articles have been posted to the online archive dating back to the beginning of 2020. A weekly roundup is available by email every Friday.

Freevacy has been shortlisted in the Best Educator category.
The PICCASO Privacy Awards recognise the people making an outstanding contribution to this dynamic and fast-growing sector.