In a blog article, Stephen Bonner, Deputy Commissioner for Regulatory Supervision at the Information Commissioner's Office (ICO), explained the ICO's decision to take no further action against the live facial recognition company, Facewatch. In concluding its investigation, the ICO is "satisfied the company has a legitimate purpose for using people’s information for the detection and prevention of crime."
Bonner explained that concerns were highlighted during the investigation, but Facewatch continued to improve its product in response. These improvements include appointing a Data Protection Officer, reducing the amount of personal data the company collects by focusing on repeat offenders or individuals committing significant offences, and protecting vulnerable people by ensuring they are not classified a “subject of interest”.
In related news, a blog post on the company's website indicates it is the first facial recognition provider to be certified by the Office of the Biometrics and Surveillance Camera Commissioner (OBSCC) under the Surveillance Camera Code of Practice (SCCP).
The ICO became aware of Facewatch in July 2022 after privacy campaigners Big Brother Watch submitted a complaint against Southern Co-operative over the retailer's use of Facewatch's facial recognition technology in 35 of its 200 stores.
What is this page?
You are reading a summary article on the Privacy Newsfeed, a free resource for DPOs and other professionals with privacy or data protection responsibilities helping them stay informed of industry news all in one place. The information here is a brief snippet relating to a single piece of original content or several articles about a common topic or thread. The main contributor is listed in the top left-hand corner, just beneath the article title.
The Privacy Newsfeed monitors over 300 global publications, of which more than 4,250 summary articles have been posted to the online archive dating back to the beginning of 2020. A weekly roundup is available by email every Friday.